《艾子》是否真的是苏轼的作品,笔者在这里讨论了以下几个问题。第一,孔凡礼、朱靖华二位先生的论证具有一定的立足点。历史背景和前后条件,固然非常重要,两位先生拿种种旁证来论证也是完全可以的,但是,这样的分析和论证,有没有因为过于想当然的看法所导致的局限性?第二,比较《艾子》与苏轼其他寓言文章的主题,我们就能够发现有很大程度不一样的特征。第三,《艾子》和苏轼的其他寓言文章,带有不尽相同的文章表现手 “Aiko” is really a work of Su Shi, the author here to discuss the following questions. First, the arguments of Kong Fanli and Zhu Jinghua have a certain foothold. The historical background and the conditions before and after are very important. It is entirely possible for the two gentlemen to take various circumstantial evidence to prove it. However, are there any limitations caused by such an overly-optimistic view of such analysis and argument? Second, Child “and Su Shi’s other allegory articles, we can find that there are very different characteristics. Third, other allegorical articles of ”Ai Zi" and Su Shi, with different expressions of articles