论文部分内容阅读
AIM To systematically review reports on deceased-donor-lobar lung transplantation(dd LLTx) and uniformly describe sizematching using the donor-to-recipient predicted-total lung-capacity(pT LC) ratio. METHODS We set out to systematically review reports on ddL LTx and uniformly describe size matching using the donorto-recipient pT LC ratio and to summarize reported oneyear survival data of ddL LTx and conventional-LTx. We searched in Pub Med, CINAHL via EBSCO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Wiley(CDSR),Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via Wiley(DARE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via Wiley(CENTRAL), Scopus(which includes EMBASE abstracts), and Web of Science for original reports on ddL LTx. RESULTS Nine observational cohort studies reporting on 301 ddL LTx met our inclusion criteria for systematic review of size matching, and eight for describing one-year-survival. The dd LLTx-group was often characterized by high acuity;however there was heterogeneity in transplant indications and pre-operative characteristics between studies. Data to calculate the pT LC ratio was available for 242 ddL LTx(80%). The mean pT LCratio before lobar resection was1.25 ± 0.3 and the transplanted pT LCratio after lobar resection was 0.76 ± 0.2. One-year survival in the ddL LTxgroup ranged from 50%-100%, compared to 72%-88%in the conventional-LTx group. In the largest study ddL LTx(n = 138) was associated with a lower one-year-survival compared to conventional-LTx(n = 539)(65.1% vs84.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Further investigations of optimal donor-to-recipient size matching parameters for ddL LTx could improve outcomes of this important surgical option.
AIM To systematically review reports on deceased-donor-lobar lung transplantation (dd LLTx) and uniformly describe sizematching using the donor-to-recipient predicted-total lung-capacity (pT LC) ratio. METHODS We set out to systematically review reports on ddL LTx and B & lt; / RTI & gt; describe distribution matching using the donorto-recipient pT LC ratio and to summarize reported one-day survival data of ddL LTx and conventional- LTx. We searched in Pub Med, CINAHL via EBSCO, Cochrane Database of System Reviews via Wiley (CDSR) Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via Wiley (DARE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via Wiley (CENTRAL), Scopus which includes EMBASE abstracts, and Web of Science for original reports on ddL LTx. RESULTS Nine observational cohort studies reporting on 301 ddL LTx met our inclusion criteria for systematic review of size matching, and eight for describing one-year-survival. The dd LLTx-group was often characterized by high acuity; however there was heterog Data to calculate the pT LC ratio was available for 242 ddL LTx (80%). The mean pT LCratio before lobar resection was 1.25 ± 0.3 and the transplanted pT LCratio after lobar resection was 0.76 ± 0.2. One-year survival in the ddL LTxgroup ranged from 50% -100%, compared to 72% -88% in the conventional-LTx group. In the largest study ddL LTx (n = 138) was associated with a CONCLUSION Further investigations of optimal donor-to-recipient size matching parameters for ddL LTx could improve results of this important surgical option.