论文部分内容阅读
前言近年来,各地墓志材料层出不穷,相关研究也热潮不断。笔者在参加胡戟、荣新江先生所主持的大唐西市博物馆藏墓志整理工作时,曾承袭《两京新记》以来对两京坊里宅邸的著录方式,按照现代学术研究标准,参考李健超先生《增订唐两京城坊考》形式,略有变通地采用荣新江先生《关于唐两京城坊建筑的著录问题》一文之意见与方式,对墓志中唐两京坊里宅第资料有所辑录考证,在此提交方家批评指正。
Foreword In recent years, an endless stream of material around the epitaphs, related research is also continuing boom. When attending the work of arranging the tombs of the museum in Datang West City under the auspices of Wu Ji and Rong Xinjiang, the author inherited the method of describing the mansions of the two Jingfang Square since the “Two New Keepers of Beijing” and according to the standards of modern academic research, With reference to Mr. Li Jianchao’s version of “Adding Tang to Two Capital Cities,” the author slightly modified his opinions and methods with a piece of article “On the Bibliographic Problems of Tang and Two Temples in Fangcheng Square” written by Mr. Rong Xinjiang. Some of the textual research, submitted here Fang criticism.