如何评价清朝初叶的文化政策,这既是清史研究中一个值得深入的问题,也是文化史研究中尚待加强的薄弱环节。以往的研究者凡论及此,每多贬抑之词,笼统地批评其消极影响多,恰当地估计其历史作用则不够。因此,对于清初经济的复苏,国家的统一,社会的趋向安定,直至康乾盛世的形成,其深层的文化心理方面的根源,迄今未能求得一个令人满意的解释。本文就此谈一些不成熟的想法,把有关的思考奉献给读者。 How to appraise the cultural policy in the early Qing Dynasty is not only a question worthy of further study in the study of Qing history but also a weak link to be strengthened in the study of cultural history. In the past, researchers have criticized this. Every word of derogatory terms has been criticized in a general way for its negative effects. It is not enough to properly assess its historical role. Therefore, for the economic recovery in the early Qing Dynasty, the unification of the country and the stabilization of society, until the formation of Kang and Qian Dynasties, its deep cultural and psychological roots have so far failed to obtain a satisfactory explanation. This article talks about some immature ideas, the relevant thinking dedicated to readers.