论文部分内容阅读
本刊在“争鸣之页”栏发表了何黄海老师的《质疑“把话说完整”》和吴栋良老师的《“主动”应为自主学习的应有之义》两篇文章,这两篇文章的作者虽然谈的是不同的两个问题,但是他们有一个共同点,就是在众说纷纭中独立思考,提出自己的看法。他们的观点虽然还有待于进一步完善、探讨,但他们这种敢于争鸣的精神是值得提倡的。理不辩不明,事物总是在对立统一中发展的。新“课标”与以往的教学大纲相比,构建了一个开放、与生活紧密联系的教学体系;通过自主、合作、探究的语文学习方式,更多地着眼于提高学生的语文综合素养、创新精神和实践能力。在新“课标”实施中就不可能不遇到许多新问题、新情况,就需要进行深入探讨和研究。我们恳请广大读者、作者就这两个问题和在教学中遇到的其他问题畅所欲言,发表自己的见解。
In the column of “Controversy,” we published two articles entitled “Questioning” by He Huanghai's teacher, “” and “Teacher Wu Dongliang's initiative” should be the proper meaning of self-study. These two articles Although the author talks about two different issues, they all have one thing in common: they think independently and make their own views. Although their views have yet to be further improved and explored, their daring spirit of contention is worthy of promotion. Reason is not unknown, things always develop in the unity of opposites. Compared with the previous syllabus, the new “curriculum standard” has constructed a teaching system that is open and closely linked with life. Through more and more self-centered, cooperative and exploratory language learning methods, more attention has been paid to improving students' overall Chinese literacy and innovation Spiritual and practical ability. In the new “standard” implementation is impossible not to encounter many new problems, new situations, we need to conduct in-depth discussion and research. We urge readers, who express their opinions on these two issues and other problems encountered in teaching.