论文部分内容阅读
关于准中止犯制度,目前学界主要围绕准中止犯的概念、特征以及类型等具体制度内容进行研究,忽视了准中止犯在不同立法例中的差异表现,这些差异根源于各国(地区)对准中止犯制度的设计理念不同。因此,本文试图通过对各国(地区)立法例的对比分析,研究准中止犯设计理念的差异所在,并从准中止犯功能定位和对“真挚性”不同理解当中提出设计我国准中止犯制度时应该坚持的理念,并以此为基础展开对准中止犯制度内容的建构。
With regard to quasi-suspend the system of commuting an offense, at present, the academic circles mainly study the specific system contents such as the concept, characteristics and types of quasi-suspect prisoners, neglecting the performance of quasi-suspend prisoners in different legislative cases, which originate from the alignment of countries The concept of abstaining from committing a crime is different. Therefore, this article attempts to study the differences between the legislative concepts and the quasi-suspects, from the comparative analysis of the legislative cases in different countries (regions), and from the quasi-suspend function orientation and the different understanding of “sincerity ”, System should adhere to the concept, and as a basis for initiating the construction of the contents of the system to stop the crime.