论文部分内容阅读
关于国民经济恢复时期国内的主要矛盾问题,在1981年党的《历史决议》发表前后,曾是理论界讨论的一个热点,这一讨论1983年以后才逐渐冷了下来,但大家的认识并未完全一致,仍有进一步讨论的必要。为此,我刊1992年第3期发表了邬家能同志《浅析国民经济恢复时期的国内主要矛盾》一文,并被中国人民大学复印资料《中国现代史》K41993年第1期全文收入。邬家能同志认为:国民经济恢复时期的国内主要矛盾是无产阶级和资产阶级的矛盾。一些同志不同意这个观点,来稿与邬家能同志商榷。因此,我刊本期特开辟争鸣专栏,发表与邬家能同志争鸣的黄爱军同志的来稿,并欢迎专家学者继续来稿参与讨论。我们认为,理论研究应坚持“学术无禁区,宣传有纪律”的原则,即学术上不同的观点,只要不是反马克思主义和散布资产阶级自由化言论,都可以通过自由讨论和公开争鸣来解决。只有通过讨论和争鸣,大家的认识才能取得一致,才能促进学术的发展和理论的进步。但在编写讲义和课堂教学中,则必须以党的决议为准绳,而不能坚持自己的观点,更不能把自己的观点强加给学生。本刊以前发表的“邬文”和本期争鸣专栏发表的“黄文”,我们均未做任何改动,因此文章只代表作者的观点,不代表本刊编者的观点。
As for the major domestic conflicts during the period of national economic recovery, it was a hot topic discussed in the theoretical circles before and after the publication of the “historic resolution” of the party in 1981, and this discussion gradually cooled down after 1983, but our understanding did not In full agreement, there is still a need for further discussion. To this end, I published in 1992 the third issue of Comrade Wu Jianeng, “Analysis of the national economic recovery period of the major domestic contradictions,” a text, and was copied by the Renmin University of China “Modern Chinese History” K41993 No. 1 full-text income. Comrade Wu Jianeng believes that the major domestic contradiction during the period of national economic recovery is the contradiction between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. Some comrades do not agree with this view. Contributions are discussed with Comrade Wu Jianeng. Therefore, I published a special column in this issue of contention, published a commentary by Comrade Huang Aijun and Comrade Wu Jianeng, and welcomed the experts and scholars to continue their contribution to the discussion. In our opinion, the theoretical study should adhere to the principle of “academia has no forbidden zones and propaganda is disciplined”. That is, academicly different views can be solved through free discussion and open argument if they are not anti-Marxist and distributed the rhetoric of bourgeois liberalization. Only through discussion and contention can all people’s understanding be unanimously agreed, in order to promote academic development and theoretical progress. However, in the preparation of lectures and classroom teaching, we must take the party’s resolution as the yardstick, not to adhere to their own point of view, but can not impose their own point of view to students. Our previous published “Wu Wen” and the “Huang Wen” published in this issue of war column, we have not made any changes, so the article represents only the author’s point of view, does not represent the view of the editor.