论文部分内容阅读
相当时间以来,在经互会成员国中经济危机的种种症候不断增加。这种危机是经互会建立以来所遇到是一次持续时间最长、影响程度最深的危机。这是行情性的危机呢,还是结构性的危机?这是不是一个暂时的衰退阶段,紧接着会不会出现新的增长?各国领导人还能不能驾驭他们的经济呢?首先需要弄清的是,经互会各国领导人自己承认的困难表现在哪些方面?让我们看看一些来自东欧的数据吧。苏联1976年～1980年第十个五年计划的各种主要指标执行结果,几乎在各个方面都低于预定的指标。苏联计划人员鉴于生产增长明显放慢的教训,对第十一个五年计划(1981～1985)年的预定指标作了修正。东欧1976～1980年的五年计划也都没有完成。经济增长从七十年代初期的7.4%降到了1980年的1%。这种衰退在1981年变得更加严重。就以罗马尼亚来说,1982年2月罗通
The symptoms of the economic crisis have been increasing for quite some time in the members of the Economic and Social Council. This crisis has been the one with the longest duration and the deepest impact since its establishment. Is this a market crisis or a structural crisis? Is this a temporary period of recession, followed by a period of new growth? Can the leaders of all countries also manage their economy? The first thing to understand Yes, what are the difficulties in recognizing the leaders of the countries themselves? Let us look at some of the data from Eastern Europe. The results of the implementation of the various major indicators of the Soviet Union’s 10th five-year plan from 1976 to 1980 were below the predetermined targets in almost every aspect. Soviet planners, in view of the noticeable slowdown in production growth, revised the targets set for the 11th five-year plan (1981-1985). The five-year plan of Eastern Europe from 1976 to 1980 was also not completed. Economic growth dropped from 7.4% in the early 1970s to 1% in 1980. This recession became even worse in 1981. In Romania, Romania in February 1982