有位记者写了篇反映某地领导为群众办了多少件实事的稿子,引起当地群众的不满。有的群众找到报社,对记者说他写进稿子里的“实事”都是没影的事。记者听后面露不悦地问:“记者听谁的?是听你们当地党委和政府的还是听你的?”不知该记者的这番有力的反诘把那些打上门来的揭疮者镇住没有,但他的提问确实是很有“力度”的——记者到底该听谁的?这还是一个理论意义和实践意义都不小的问题。 记者听谁的?这里说的是记者在采访时听谁的,这里的“听”也不仅是视觉器官的事,还包括记者的判断和认识。这位记者所问明显有两层意思。一是听谁说,二是信谁的。 A journalist wrote a manuscript that reflected how many realities the leader of a certain place had done for the masses and aroused the dissatisfaction of the local people. Some people found the newspaper, told reporters that he was included in the manuscript of the “real thing” are not affected. After listening to reporters unhappyly asked: “The reporter to listen to whom? Listen to your local party committees and governments or to listen to you?” I do not know the reporter’s powerful counter-counterow that the door-to-door therapists did not live in town , But his question is indeed very “strength” - reporter in the end to listen to whom? This is a theoretical and practical significance is not small problem. What is the reporter listening to? Here is the reporter who listened to in the interview, where “listening” is not only a matter of visual organs, but also includes the reporter’s judgment and understanding. The reporter asked clearly two things. First, listen to who said, the second is who the letter.