正如同许许多多旧知识分子一样,樊粹庭先生出身子封建地主家庭,后来又受了长时期的资产阶级教育,如果说象他这样的人在思想上没有缺陷,那是谁也不会相信的事。正因为如此,他所编的剧本里,就必然会有许多非无产阶级的思想杂质。但我们绝不能因此就可以对樊戏采取一笔抹杀、盖棺论定的蛮横态度。河南日报去年发表了许多关于樊粹庭剧作的评论文章,给樊粹庭扣了许多大帽子,甚么“宿命论”、“因果报应”,“宣扬封建道德”等等,真是形形色色,不一而足。这些帽子是否扣得合适,我认为有重新加以研究讨论的必要。自从有一些人在河南日报上以权威姿态向樊粹庭接连开了几炮之后,便好象给 Like so many old intellectuals, Mr. Fan Queting, a feudal landlord family, was later educated for a long period of time by the bourgeoisie who would not believe it if there was no ideological flaw in such people as him thing. Because of this, there are bound to be many non-proletarian ideological impurities in his plays. However, we must not therefore take the slightest slap on the fan scene and argue in the most outrageous manner. Last year, Henan Daily published a number of commentary articles on Fan Quateng’s dramas. Quite a few big bonnets to Fan Fanting, such as “fatalism,” “karma,” “promotion of feudal morality,” and so on are really varied. Whether these hats are deserved, I think there is a need to re-examine the discussion. Since some people have posed several guns to Fan Quatun in an authoritative manner in the Henan Daily, they seem to give