论文部分内容阅读
20世纪20年代前期,北京大学和东南大学是中国现代高等教育的两大重镇,双方在学术文化上展开激烈的竞争。其中《新青年》杂志与《学衡》杂志是两个主要新媒体阵地,双方围绕文学的新旧与真假、文言与白话的优劣、孔子与传统文化、新人文主义与实验主义等问题展开针锋相对的论战,并呈现出传统与现代、新旧之争的表象,其实质亦远远超出中西之争的范围。北大派与东大派的学术文化之争集中昭示西方现代大学进入中国后始终面临如何处理中国传统文化与西方现代化的难题。《新青年》与《学衡》的文化论争所依托的主体是北京大学与东南大学,充分显示出现代学人纷纷借助大学这一新的平台,传播其文化观念的种种努力,这一现象亦成为民国“学分南北”的重要地缘与派分源头。
In the early 1920s, Peking University and Southeast University were the two major centers of modern Chinese higher education. Both sides started fierce competition in academic culture. Among them, “New Youth” magazine and “Xueheng” magazine are two major new media positions. Both sides focus on issues such as the old and new from the literature, the pros and cons of classical Chinese and vernacular, Confucius and traditional culture, neo-humanism and experimentalism The tit-for-tat controversy has shown the appearance of the struggle between tradition and modernity as well as between old and new, far beyond the scope of the dispute between China and the West. The controversy over the academic culture between Peking University School and Dongda School has focused on the difficulty that Western modern universities always face when dealing with China’s traditional culture and the modernization of the West. The main body of the cultural debate between “New Youth” and “Academic Balance” is Peking University and Southeast University. This phenomenon fully shows that modern scholars have used this new platform of universities to spread their cultural concepts Become the Republic of China “credits North and South ” important geography and faction source.