论文部分内容阅读
读了《一种新妁推理形式》一文(见本刊1982年第三期,以下简称《新形式》),我是赞成的。不过,说‘新’实已不新,古书上广泛运用这种形式进行推理,现代语言中也是司空见惯的。只是逻辑专门家没把它俯拾进各自的著述里而已。尽管它不能在逻辑书上有一席之位,可是实际思维里扣文章、讲话中则往往无法避开,避开了它,有许多的推理和论说就不能进行了。关于这种推理形式,我认为还需补充如下几点。一、《新形式》一文只是论证了这种推理形式在复句里和句群里的运用。其实,还不止于此。它还可以作为整篇文章的基本的逻辑结构。
I read the article “A New Form of Reasoning” (see my third issue, 1982, hereinafter referred to as “the new form”). I agree. However, it is not new to say that the ’new’ principle is widely used in ancient texts. It is also commonplace in modern languages. It is only logical professionals who have not put it into their own writings only. Although it can not have a place in logical books, it is often impossible to evade articles in actual thinking and avoid it. There are many reasons and arguments that can not be advanced. Regarding this form of reasoning, I think the following points need to be added. First, the article “The New Form” merely demonstrates the application of this form of reasoning in complex sentences and sentences. In fact, this is not the end. It also serves as the basic logical structure for the entire article.