一、原旨主义解释方法的时代背景现今,世界上几乎每个国家都有宪法,但是具体到宪政、法治的实施,却没有最初立宪时乐观。没有宪政的宪法就是一个装饰的花瓶,只会成为供人观赏的物品,完美的体制应当是宪政和宪法的相依相伴的成长。而美国的宪政历史就是伴随着关于宪法解释的争论逐渐成长起来的。美国享有最高权威的宪法从诞生之初与大法官们、联邦最高法院和司法权并没有多少联系,但是在马伯里诉麦迪逊案判决后,宪法就与司法权、联邦最高法院真正不可割裂了。谈到美国的宪法解释就无法撇开美国的政治,无法抛开美国的司法制度,无法抛开大法官们,更无法抛开对于原旨主义和非原旨主义 First, the original background of the method of interpretation of the original doctrine Nowadays, almost every country in the world has a constitution, but specifically to the implementation of constitutional government and the rule of law, but did not optimistic when the initial constitutional. A constitutional constitution is a decorative vase that can only become an object for people to watch. The perfect system should be accompanied by the growth of constitutionalism and constitutional dependency. The history of constitutionalism in the United States is accompanied by the growing debate over the interpretation of the constitution. The United States enjoyed the highest authority from the very beginning of the constitutional justice and justice, the federal Supreme Court and the judicial power is not much contact, but in the Marbury v. Madison case, the constitution and the judiciary, the federal Supreme Court can not be divided It’s When it comes to the constitutional interpretation of the United States, it is impossible to put aside the politics of the United States, to abandon the judicial system in the United States, to abandon the judges, and even to the principleism and non-fundamentalism