《新闻战线》的《读者论坛》办得很活跃,可是也有为文而文的形式主义现象。这里举一个“自相矛盾”的例子,供贵刊编辑同志研究。去年《新闻战线》第10期第30页,登了《“词”和“词汇”别混淆》一篇短文,指出“词汇”是一种语言里的全部的词,它和单个的“词”的概念不同,不可混淆。这无疑是对的。然而到了第33页,贵刊在刊登老舍同志那篇《记者的语言修养》一文时,就置前文的议论于不顾了。请看:老舍同志文章在第19节里说:“文章单调,是因为只知道那几个词汇,没有办法选择。”这里的“词汇”不正是“词”的误用吗!我认为,老舍同志偶然出现的笔误,本不值得大 The “Reader’s Forum” of “the news front” has been very active, but there are also formalistic phenomena that are written and textual. Here is a “paradoxical” example for your editor to study. Last year, “News Fight,” Issue 10, p. 30, posted an essay on “Do not Confuse” with “Vocabulary,” stating that “Vocabulary” is the entire word in a language that is synonymous with a single “word” The concept of different, can not be confused. This is undoubtedly correct. However, on page 33, when you published an article in Lao She’s article entitled “Language Literacy of Journalists,” your article disregarded the previous argument. See: Lao She comrade article in section 19, said: “The article monotonous, because only know that a few words, there is no way to choose.” “Vocabulary” here is not the “word” misuse it! I think Lao She Occasional clerical mistakes, this is not worth the money