细心的读者或许能发现,在我们的种种“批判”中选取的参照系是全国其他高新区和中关村自身,而没有选择美国的硅谷——如其他媒体习惯的那样。没有人能否认硅谷的巨大成功,就像谁也无法否认技术创新是知识经济的原动力一样。但问题是现在的中关村具备和国外大公司正面抗争的实力吗?更进一步说,我们有必要克隆一个硅谷吗? 有一位媒体同行曾给中关村开过一个药方:有创新的跟随策略。与中关村的现实情况联系起来看,不无道理。尽管技术革新派曾经嘲笑compaq更多地像个计算 An attentive reader may find that the reference frames selected in our various “criticisms” are other high-tech zones in the country and Zhongguancun itself, but not the Silicon Valley of the United States - as other media are accustomed to. No one can deny the great success of Silicon Valley, just as no one can deny that technological innovation is the driving force behind the knowledge economy. However, the question is: Does Zhongguancun now have the strength to fight against foreign companies? Further, do we need to clone a Silicon Valley? A media colleague once gave a prescription to Zhongguancun: an innovative follow-up strategy. It is not unreasonable to associate it with the reality of Zhongguancun. Although the technologists once mocked compaq more like a calculation