论文部分内容阅读
一、“公共利益”条款产生的理论渊源自从1904年加拿大为保护国内产业,开始单方面实施反倾销立法以来,关于倾销行为的性质及反倾销政策与规则一直是一个争论不休的话题。1994年反倾销协定第2.1条对倾销作了定义:如果一项产品从一国出口到另一国,而产品的出口价格在正常贸易过程中低于在出口国旨在用于消费的相似产品的可比价格,即低于正常价值进入另一国的商业,则该产品将被认为是倾销。如果同时符合第3条,确定存在损害或重大损害之威胁,则可以依据第9.1条征收不超过倾销幅度的反倾销税。在围绕着倾销行为的性质及反倾销政策与规则的争论中,总体上存在两种声音。一种声音认为,反倾销措施是保护国内产业所需,如果没有
First, the “public interest” provisions of the theory originated from Canada in 1904 to protect the domestic industry, the unilateral implementation of anti-dumping legislation, the nature of dumping and anti-dumping policies and rules has been a topic of endless debate. Article 2.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement of 1994 defines dumping: if a product is exported from one country to another and the export price of the product is lower in the normal course of trade than similar products intended to be consumed in the exporting country Comparable price, that is, less than normal value to enter another country’s commerce, then the product will be considered dumping. If the same time in line with Article 3, to determine the existence of the threat of damage or significant damage, you can be imposed under Article 9.1 does not exceed the dumping margin anti-dumping duties. Around the nature of dumping and anti-dumping policies and rules of the debate, there are two general voices. A voice believes that anti-dumping measures are needed to protect the domestic industry, if not