论文部分内容阅读
本文将区分几个相连结的知识步骤,逐一简述学界已零星出现的反省角度。首先,是关于中国作为研究对象,是什么意义的对象,亦即本体论的探究,可大别之为无本体论与有本体论。其次在有本体论的预设下,关于本体的知识是主观的或客观的。再其次,在客观知识的预设下,中国相关知识是属于普遍性知识的一环,或是不可与其它知识共量的特殊性或相对性知识。接着,在普遍性知识的预设下,这个知识是否具有历史终极的目的与通往目的单一途径。第五,在线性历史目的论的预设下,取得中国知识的方法论依据,是自由经济制度主义的问题意识或唯物阶级史观。最后,在自由经济制度主义的方法论预设下,采用归纳的历史方法或演绎的理性抉择方法,之间有何实践意义上的差别。本文亦将触及研究组织与研究环境的问题,并试拟一套关于知识论的研究议程。
This article will distinguish between several linked steps of knowledge, one by one outlining the field of study has emerged sporadic reflection. First of all, it is the object of what significance China regards as the research object, that is to say, ontological inquiry can be regarded as non-ontological and ontological. Second, under the assumption of ontology, the knowledge about ontology is subjective or objective. Thirdly, under the precondition of objective knowledge, the relevant knowledge in China belongs to the part of universal knowledge or the particularity or relative knowledge that can not be shared with other knowledge. Then, under the presupposition of universal knowledge, does this knowledge have the ultimate goal of history and the single path to the goal. Fifthly, under the precondition of linear historical teleology, the methodological basis for obtaining Chinese knowledge is the question consciousness or the materialist class historical view of free economic institutionalism. Finally, under the precondition of the methodology of liberal economic institutionalism, there is a practical difference between adopting the inductive historical method or the rational choice method of deduction. This article will also address the issue of studying the organization and the research environment and will try to develop a research agenda on epistemology.