论文部分内容阅读
已报告的工作人员受伤人攻击率与实际情况相比是估价偏低的,其原因包括:对攻击所下的定义不同、受伤害的程度不同、工作人员对攻击习以为常、其他工作人员对这类报道的压制程度不同等。此外,怕因此而受责备、怕因此而填写过我的文字表格,那些并未目睹事件经过的人所写的报告不全面或失实也有关系。由于普遍认为应当从关心病人的角度去看待工作人员受攻击,因此使研究攻击对护理人员的影响变得极为困难和复杂。 Camel和Hunter(1989)报导他们医院中16%的护理人同在1年内曾受到轻重不一
The reported rates of attacks on staff injuries have been underestimated as compared with the actual situation for several reasons, including the definition of the attack, the degree of victimization, the staff familiarity with the attack, and other staff members’ The degree of repression reported is different. In addition, fear of being blamed for fear of filling in my written form, and the incompleteness or misrepresentation of those who did not witness the passing of the incident. The impact of research attacks on caregivers has become extremely difficult and complex, given the widespread belief that workers should be attacked from a patient-care perspective. Camel and Hunter (1989) reported that 16% of caregivers in their hospitals had suffered from varying severity within one year