论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析烧伤感染难愈行扩创植皮联合负压封闭引流治疗的疗效。方法:随机抽取我院2013至2014收治60例烧伤患者,将其分为观察组与对照组各30例,对照组采用常规治疗,观察组采用扩创植皮联合负压封闭引流技术进行治疗。比较两组的治疗效果。结果:观察组总有效率100%,对照组总有效率90%;通过对两组的住院时间、治疗前后烧伤面积等进行比较,观察组的疗效明显要优于对照组,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:烧伤感染难愈采用扩创植皮联合负压封闭引流治疗,取得良好的治疗效果。
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the curative effect of refractory burns combined with grafting and skin grafting combined with negative pressure closed drainage. Methods: Sixty burn patients were randomly selected from our hospital from 2013 to 2014. The patients were divided into observation group and control group, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated by conventional therapy. The observation group was treated with augmented skin grafting combined with negative pressure closed drainage. Compare the treatment effect of two groups. Results: The total effective rate was 100% in the observation group and 90% in the control group. By comparing the length of hospital stay and the area of burn before and after treatment, the curative effect of the observation group was obviously better than that of the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups Statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Burns infection is difficult to be cured with augmented skin grafting combined negative pressure drainage treatment, and achieved good therapeutic effect.