“人民教育”三月号讀者來信欄刊載了罗端本对前建國中学領導幹部的意見,我們結合当時实际情况,檢查如下: 当時的教学工作是存在着形式主义的。如訂学期工作計劃先由校長、教導主任起稿,然後開全体教職員工会議,傳達計劃草案,讓大家提意見。因事先没有很好的準备和醞釀,大家很少提出意見。这样通过的計劃既不是真正从羣众中來,而且在內容上又是空洞的原則多,具体作法少,也就很难在羣众中貫徹下去。事实上教研組和各科教師早把这个空洞和脫离实际的“計劃”丟在腦後了。还有,領導幹部虽然思想上注意了教学工作,但对如何具体領導还是感到困难。同時幹部間分工不明確,乱抓一把,忙忙乱乱,不但影响了深入教学工作,同時也陷入了事务主义的圈子。 領導幹部的政治学習,是和教師在一起的,虽組 In the letter column of the March issue of People’s Education, Luo Daben’s Opinion on the former leading cadres in Jianguo High School was published. Combined with the prevailing circumstances, we examined the following: There was formalism in teaching at that time. Such as the semester work plan by the principal, the teaching director draft, and then open the entire staff meeting, to convey the draft plan, so that everyone comments. Because there is no prior preparation and deliberation, we rarely make any comments. The plan adopted in this way is neither based on genuine principles from the masses but on the content being empty. Practically speaking, there are few specific practices and it is very difficult to carry them out among the masses. In fact, teaching and research teams and teachers in various departments have long ago left behind this empty and out-of-date “plan.” In addition, although leading cadres pay more attention to teaching work, they still find it difficult to determine how to lead them. At the same time, the division of labor among cadres is not clear, and the indiscriminate grasping and the indiscriminate chaos have not only affected the in-depth teaching work, but also plunged into the circle of affairs. The political study of leading cadres is with teachers, though groups