一、导论在英美法系国家,排除合理怀疑是法官用来指导陪审团认定案件事实、做出有罪裁判的重要司法指令。因为在英美法系国家的司法审判中,陪审团负责案件事实的裁判,被告人有罪无罪最终取决于陪审团做出的裁判。作为从社会大众中挑选出的普通人,当他们的抉择影响到被告人的人身自由之时他们该如何面对,他们该如何做出公正的决断成为一直以来困扰着陪审团的问题。而排除合理怀疑恰恰是解决陪审团裁判中所面临的难 I. Introduction In Anglo-American legal systems, excluding reasonable doubt is an important judicial directive that a judge uses to guide a jury in finding a case and making a guilty verdict. Because in the Anglo-American legal system in the country’s judicial trial, the jury is responsible for the facts of the case of the case, the accused guilty innocent ultimately depends on the jury’s decision. As an ordinary person selected from the general public, how they should face their choices when they affect the individual’s freedom of the accused, how they should make a fair and equitable decision has been a problem that has plagued the jury all along. And excluding reasonable doubt is just the difficulty in resolving jury referees