本文摘自《经济学人》。由名字可以理解,他是有关未来公司的,但是他并非是讨论公司未来的有或无,事实上,统观全文,结论是公司依然会存在,只不过一些巨型的垄断公司可能会遇到麻烦,公司将被迫转型。它用更多篇幅集中于探讨公司将来可能的形态,尤其是网络状态下公司遭遇到的很多深刻的变化,虽然有些观点看起来可能更适合美国的经济形态。但是中国已经昂然进入WTO,接下来必然会面临相当多的国际挑战,作为国内企业也必须改变自己长期以来存活的形象,如文中所言,要“细瘦、灵活、注重声誉、提高能力”,更加注重顾客和政府关系,这些东西是通用的,希望对国内企业也能有所借鉴,进而从各方面提升自己,立于不败之地。 ——编者按 This article is from “The Economist.” It is understandable by name that he is about the future company, but he is not talking about the company's future or not, in fact, the whole article, the conclusion is that the company still exists, but some giant monopoly companies may encounter trouble , The company will be forced to transition. It uses more space to focus on the possible future shape of the company, especially the many profound changes companies face in the network, though some may seem more appropriate to the U.S. economy. However, China has already entered into the WTO with great concern, and will inevitably face quite a lot of international challenges. As a domestic enterprise, it must also change its image of long-term survival. As mentioned in the article, China needs to be “thin and flexible, pay attention to its reputation and improve its ability” Pay more attention to the relationship between customers and the government. These things are universal, and they hope that they can also learn from the domestic enterprises and then upgrade themselves from all aspects and remain invincible. - Editor's note