论文部分内容阅读
本文研究网络言论传播中的自我净化机制问题,选取人民网强国论坛和网易唾客论坛作为案例,结合内容分析、文本分析和深度访谈进行研究。结论发现,除民族主义、反日问题以及自由民主问题以外,强国论坛和网易论坛都在其他所有内容指标上表现出极端负面化的观点,并且大多数的帖子信息含量极少。如果论坛中言论传播最后能得到理性中立的舆论,我们就认为该论坛具有自我净化机制。在此参照下,强国论坛与网易唾客论坛都没有好的言论自我净化机制。但经过对比研究,强国论坛比网易论坛的自我净化能力要好,这主要是由核心网友传播方式、论坛管理、网友构成等几个因素决定的。除此之外,研究还发现强国论坛鲜明的群体“左派”立场以及网易论坛粗俗化、空洞化的特征,并且提出了进一步的研究问题。
This paper studies the issue of self-purification mechanism in the spread of online speech, selects People’s Power Forum and Netease Forum as a case study, and combines content analysis, text analysis and in-depth interview. The conclusion shows that, in addition to nationalism, anti-Japanese issues, and issues of freedom and democracy, the Forums and Netease Forums all show extremely negative views on all other content indicators, and most of the posts contain very little information. If the forums at the end of the spread of speech can get rational neutrality of public opinion, we think that the forum has a self-purification mechanism. In this reference, Power Forum and Netease saliva forum are not good self-purification mechanisms of speech. However, after a comparative study, the Powerful Forum is better at self-purifying than the Netease Forum, which is mainly determined by several factors such as the way in which the core netizens communicate, the management of the forum, and the composition of netizens. In addition, the study also found that the Forum of Strong Nations clearly “Leftist” position and Netease Forum vulgarization, hollowing out characteristics, and put forward further research issues.