论文部分内容阅读
关于胡适,最大悬疑就是老先生的博士学位问题。余英时先生认为这是无中生有,是1920年左右梅光迪先生挑起的,由此看来,这应是哥大时先生酝酿文学改良和任叔永、梅光迪等先生论争留下的“隐患”。但不管怎么争论,关于他的学位论文却不可能存疑,那就是《中国古代哲学方法之进化史》(1983年上海学林出版社印行中文版时译名为《先秦名学史》)。从这个名称,稍加一想,任何人即不难看出,不管我们后来给胡适加多少个头衔,胡适是从中国历史起步的,虽然中国传统文史哲不分,这个“史”还是构成了胡适存在的前提,胡适首先是个“历史学家”。
About Hu Shi, the biggest suspense is the old doctor’s doctorate. Mr YU Ying-shi thinks this is a nonsense event which was provoked by Mr Mei Guangdi around 1920. From this perspective, this should be a hidden danger that Mr. Ge Zhisu brewing literature improvement and the controversy between Mr. Ren Shouyong and Mr. “. However, no matter how controversial his dissertation can not be questioned, it is ”the history of the evolution of ancient Chinese philosophy“ (Shanghai Xue Lin Publishing House in 1983 when the Chinese version was translated as ”pre-Qin History of Ming Dynasty“). From this name, with a little thought, it is not difficult for anyone to see that regardless of how many titles we later added to Hu Shih, Hu Shih started from the history of China. Although China’s traditional history and literature are not separated from one another, this history still constitutes Hu Shih preconditions exist, Hu Shi first is a ”historian ".