有计划的商品经济作为我国相当长历史时期中的经济制度的确立,从根本上确认了计划与市场结合的必要性。对于怎样实现这种结合,理论界提出了一系列命题,如“板块论”“主辅论”“渗透论”“有机结合论”“二次调节论”“分层结合论”等。这些命题多注重计划与市场这一对概念在逻辑上的辨证统一,思辨性较强,多属于静态的规范分析,缺乏对计划与市场的有关问题进行实证分析的基础,因而都显得既有一定道理又不充分、不深入, The planned commodity economy, as the establishment of an economic system in the relatively long historical period of our country, fundamentally confirmed the necessity of combining planning with the market. For how to achieve this combination, theorists have put forward a series of propositions, such as “theory of plate theory”, “principle and auxiliary theory”, “theory of percolation”, “organic combination theory” “secondary regulation theory” “Tiered theory ” and so on. These propositions pay more attention to the logic and dialectical unity of the concept of planning and the market. They have strong speculativeness and mostly static normative analysis. They lack the basis for empirical analysis on issues related to planning and marketing. The reason is not sufficient, not in-depth,