许多人把“三个和尚没水吃”的矛头对准和尚,批评三个和尚因为“懒软散等靠推”而造成没水吃。愚认为,这有失公允。没水吃的问题固然与和尚有关,但“和尚”的上级——“方丈”,也有不可推卸的责任。 本来,一个和尚挑水满可以完成任务,如果让其承包,更能调动积极性,再加上政策优惠,吃水根本不成问题。但是,寺庙管和尚的方丈没有这样做。当一个和尚干得正起劲的时候,他又调来第二、第三个和尚,因为没有明确责任,故由“挑水”变为“抬水”和扯皮,这样,该寺的吃水就困难了。 Many people pointed the “three monks to no water” to the monks and criticized the three monks for having no water to eat because of “lazy soft drinks, etc.”. According to Yu, this is unfair. The problem of no water to eat is related to the monk, but the superior of the “Monk,” the “abbot,” also has an irresponsible responsibility. Originally, a monk could take the water to complete the task. If he is allowed to contract, he can mobilize his enthusiasm and add policy preferences. Draught is not a problem at all. However, the monk of the temple monk did not do this. When a monk was doing a good job, he also transferred the second and the third monk because he did not have a clear responsibility. Therefore, he changed from “fetching water” to “lifting water” and wrangling. As a result, the draught of the monastery was difficult. Now.