论文部分内容阅读
教唆犯的属性与一国的犯罪论体系一脉相承。教唆行为的法律本质是决定教唆犯属性的核心内容。教唆犯独立性体制下的教唆行为实行行为说与教唆犯从属性体制下的教唆行为共犯行为说都存在不可逾越的理论暗礁。教唆行为的非独立构成性否定了教唆行为的犯罪实行行为性,将教唆行为定义为共犯行为具有片面性,犯罪预备性是教唆行为的原则属性。由于教唆行为的法律本质是所教唆之罪的犯罪预备行为,德日刑法坚持教唆犯从属性理论与其不处罚无独立犯罪构成要件的预备行为之犯罪论体系一脉相承,而英美刑法主张教唆犯独立性与其根据教唆的后果不同而分别立法的犯罪论体系遥相呼应。我国非独立预备犯的立法模式、一元之共犯参与体系及独立教唆犯的立法规定决定了我国犯罪论及立法体系中的教唆犯具有独立性。我国犯罪论体系中的教唆犯独立性理论不仅体系完整,逻辑严密,而且避免了其他各说顾此失彼的缺陷,并维持了构成要件的定型作用。
The abettor’s attributes are in the same line as the criminal system of a country. The legal nature of abetting is the core of determining the abettor’s attributes. The abetting behavior under the system of abettor independence and the abetting behavior under the abusive system of accomplices means that there are insurmountable theoretical reefs. The non-independent constitutive of abetting negates the act of abetting crime, and the abetting behavior is defined as the one-sidedness of accomplice behavior and the preparatory nature of crime as the principle attribute of abetting behavior. Because of the nature of the law of abetting is the crime preparatory act of abetting crime, the criminal law of Germany and Japan upholds the theory that the abettor’s subordination theory inherits from the criminal theory system that it does not punish the preparatory act of independent criminal elements, while the British and American criminal law advocates the abettor’s independence And echoes the crime system which is separately legislated according to the different consequences of the incitement. The legislative model of non-independent preparatory offender in our country, the participation system of one-dollar accomplice, and the legislative provisions of an independent abettor determine that our abettor in the crime and legislation system is independent. The theory of the abettor’s independence in the system of criminology in our country not only has a complete system and strict logic, but also avoids the other flaws of giving and taking care of each other, and maintains the stereotyped role of the constituent elements.