论文部分内容阅读
商标确权行政行为本质上是商标局或商标评审委员会居间地对平等主体之间关于商标权效力或权属所发生争议进行的行政裁决行为。现有解决商标确权行政纠纷的制度设计囿于行政诉讼类型化的不足,按照撤销之诉的诉讼类型对上述行政裁决行为进行司法审查,没有充分注意到商标确权纠纷“形为行政争议,实为民事争议”的特殊性,导致当事人在行政诉讼中的角色出现错位,未能充分汲取原告提起行政诉讼的真正诉求,进而使商标确权行政纠纷无法得到实质性解决,程序拖沓冗长,浪费了宝贵的行政资源和司法资源。对此,司法实践在裁判方式方面亦进行了一些创新和改革,但无论是直接宣告商标权效力的裁判方式,还是明确商标评审委员会重作具体行政行为内容的裁判方式,都存在或者无法实现行政权和司法权的有效平衡,或者无法彻底解决循环诉讼的问题。相较之下,在判决撤销商标评审委员会维持商标有效行政裁决的同时,并不要求其重作具体行政行为,而是判令商标权人限期注销或转移争议商标的裁判方式,不仅没有损害商标局或商标评审委员会在确定商标权效力方面的行政权力,亦能避免后续循环诉讼的滋生,不失为一种实质性解决知识产权授权确权行政纠纷的有效裁判路径。
Trademark Confirmation The administrative act is essentially the administrative ruling conducted by the Trademark Office or the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board on the equality between the parties regarding the validity of the trademark right or the dispute over the ownership. The existing system design for resolving the administrative disputes with the firm title of trademark is not enough for the type of administrative litigation and the judicial review of the aforesaid administrative rulings is conducted in accordance with the type of lawsuit for revoking the litigation. The fact that the parties are in the administrative proceedings is misplaced and the actual demands of the plaintiff in instituting the administrative proceedings are not fully taken into account. As a result, the administrative disputes over the ownership of the trademarks can not be substantively resolved and the proceedings are too long , Wasting valuable administrative and judicial resources. Judicial practice has also carried out some innovations and reforms in terms of the mode of adjudication. However, both the mode of adjudication that directly declares the validity of a trademark right and the mode of adjudication that the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board re-complies with the specific administrative act have or can not be implemented Effective balance of power and jurisdiction, or can not completely solve the problem of circular litigation. In contrast, the decision to withdraw the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board to maintain an effective trademark administrative decision, but does not require it to redouble its specific administrative act, but to make a trademark trademark cancellation or transfer of controversial trademark deadline, not only did not damage the trademark The administrative authority of the Board or the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board in determining the validity of a trademark right can also avoid the breeding of subsequent circular litigation, which is an effective way to resolve substantive disputes over the authorization of intellectual property rights.