自从党指出学术界目前存在着严重的“厚古薄今”倾向以后,引起学术界很大的注意,正在展开热烈的讨论。我们四中历史组的同志们,最初认为这是学术研究工作上或高等学校教学上的问题,在中学历史教学里,并不存在这个问题。即或存在,问题也不大。理由是我们中学历史课程已经是详今略古了。我们大多数中学教师都是根据教学大纲、课本进行教学的,根本不可能随便任自己厚薄来讲课,也很少有人作专题研究工作,哪有什么厚薄的问题呢?如果说教材有厚古簿今问题,责任也不应由教师负。后经双反运动教师 Since the party pointed out that there is a serious tendency of “thick and thin” in academia at present, it has drawn great attention from academics and discussions are going on warmly. The comrades of our four history groups initially thought it was a problem in the academic research work or in the teaching of higher learning. This problem does not exist in the history teaching of middle schools. That is, or there is no problem. The reason is that our middle school history course is already outdated. Most of our secondary school teachers are teaching under the syllabus and textbooks. It is impossible for us to give lectures simply on the basis of their own thickness, nor do we make any special studies. What is the problem with thick and thin books? Today’s problem, responsibility should not be negative teachers. After double anti-movement teacher