论文部分内容阅读
《史记·律书》有“黄钟长八寸七分一，宫”的一组律数，至迟从唐代起，人们就把它看作一组弦律数据，并以为原数据甚误而不可解，从而校正勘误。本文经过严格推算后指出：１．该组律数不是弦律。而是管律；２．该组律数的原数据基本上没有错，尤其是“黄钟长八寸七分一”是完全正确的黄钟管长，由于历代校勘家不辨弦律与管律之别，书“七”字改为“十”字，从而认为《律书》中这段文字“误七句、衍二字”，历代的校改本质上是错误的；３．在历代传抄翻刻《史记》的过程中，律数原数据中有三律的律位与数值被窜乱。在更正被窜乱了的这三律之后，作者对原数据小作校正，并补正了原数据中遗漏和误植的二律数值，恢复了《史记》所载的先秦管律的本来面目。
“Historical Records Law” has a set of “Huang Zhongchang eight inches seven one, the palace,” a set of law numbers, as from the Tang Dynasty, people regard it as a set of string data, and that the original data is very wrong and can not be solved, and thus Correction Errata. After rigorous calculation this article points out: 1. The law is not string law. But the law; 2. The original data of this group of law is basically not wrong, especially “Huang Chung-long eight-inch seven one-one” is completely correct Huang Zhongguan long, as the collation of the previous dynasties do not distinguish between string law and discipline, the book “seven” To “ten” words, so that the “law” in this paragraph of text “wrong seven sentences, Yan word”, the previous revision is essentially wrong; In the dynasties copied over the “Historical Records” in the process of the original data in the law there are three law positions and values were chaos. After correcting the three laws that had been tampered with, the author corrected the original data and corrected the dichotomous values missing from the original data and mistakenly implanted, thus restoring the true nature of the pre-Qin law contained in Historical Records.