论文部分内容阅读
全国首届册页书法作品展览、全国第二届草书艺术大展的“作品照片”初评的创意,引起了广大书友广泛关注,有人建议网络图片投稿,有人坚持原作投稿。网文《为什么不选择网络由“作品照片”引发的话题》是争议的引子,由此引发了更为深广的探讨。为什么不选择网络?正方质疑网络技术、网络运作方式等;反方倡议以先进生产力发展先进文化,认为网络不是问题,人才是问题的根本等。双方针锋相对,畅所欲言。事理越辩越明,相信对于作品照片、网络图片、原作等不同的投稿方式,每个人心里都会有一个评判的标准。国展系列由原件现场初评到作品照片初评的变通,就体现了中国书法家协会改革的思路。集思广益,在改革中发展,国展系列还应将怎样改革呢?显然,以下的讨论已经远远超出了作品照片的本义,但有一点很明确,大家都有一致的强烈意愿,希望国展系列逐步完善运作机制,继续主导展览文化,繁荣书法事业。凡真正的批评者都会有强烈的社会责任感,路过看过都会把智慧贡献,且看辩手如何“论剑评弹”。
The nation’s first album calligraphy exhibition, the second national cursive art exhibition “works of photographs ” first comment of the creative, aroused widespread concern of the majority of book friends, some people suggest network pictures submitted, some people insist on the original submission. The essay “Why not choose a network by ” works photos “triggered by the topic” is a controversial introduction, which led to a more extensive discussion. Why do not we choose the network? The square question the network technology and the network operation mode. The anti-party initiative calls for the development of advanced culture with advanced productive forces, thinking that the network is not a problem and that personnel are the root cause of the problem. Both sides are tit for tat. The more cleverer the more clear the matter, I believe that for the works of photos, web pictures, the original contribution of different manners, everyone will have a heart in the evaluation criteria. National Exhibition series from the original scene of the initial assessment of the work of the initial assessment of the workable variant, it reflects the Chinese calligraphers Association reform ideas. Clearly, the following discussion has gone far beyond the original meaning of the photos of the work, but one thing is clear, everyone has the same strong will, I hope the National Exhibition Series Gradually improve the operating mechanism, continue to dominate the exhibition culture, flourishing calligraphy. Where true critics will have a strong sense of social responsibility, passing through will contribute to wisdom, and the pro-debate hand how .