论文部分内容阅读
人格权法之中要数荣誉权的争论最大。荣誉权的性质、内容等方面至今没有统一的看法,造成了荣誉权人的权利得不到及时有效的保护。而荣誉权的性质又是其中最有待解决的问题。目前有人格权说、身份权说、双重属性说、非民事权利说四种观点。本文对以上几种观点的利弊进行分析总结并着重分析了人格权说与身份权说这两个得到支持最多的学说。通过比较分析得出了荣誉权应属身份权的结论。最后,本文通过两个案例分析了英雄与劳模的权利保护问题,得出荣誉权归于身份权可行并且必要的结论。
Personality and personality rights to the most controversial honor. As to the nature and content of the right of honor, there is no unified view so far, resulting in the failure of the right holders to obtain timely and effective protection. The nature of the right to honor is one of the most outstanding issues. At present, there are four kinds of views on the right of personality, the right to say, the dual attribute and the non-civil right. This article analyzes and summarizes the pros and cons of the above views and emphatically analyzes the two most supported doctrines of personality right and identity right. Through the comparative analysis, we conclude that the right of honor should belong to the right of identity. Finally, this article analyzes the protection of the rights of heroes and model workers through two cases, and draws the conclusion that the right of honor belongs to the identity right and necessary.