论文部分内容阅读
本文整理了ITC官方网站上公布的反倾销、反补贴调查终裁投票结果,从所有案件中遴选出委员投票存在分歧的案件。通过分析分歧案件中ITC委员的投票结果,并与其在所有案件中的投票结果相比较,本文剔除了技术性因素对分析ITC委员投票行为中政治倾向的影响,从而更加客观地评价了ITC是否存在对中国的歧视。本文发现,从整体裁决结果的层面上看,分歧案件中ITC对中国的肯定性裁决比例要远低于在所有案件中的肯定性裁决比例,且更加接近ITC在所有分歧案件中的整体肯定性裁决比例。从委员个人投票行为的层面上看,绝大多数委员都并未因案件涉及中国而改变其贸易政策立场,对中国存在“善意”和“敌意”的委员在力量对比上也是基本平衡的。故没有充分证据说明ITC对中国存在歧视。
This article sorted out the final voting results of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations published on the official website of ITC, and selected cases in which all members voted in disagreement. By analyzing the voting results of ITC members in disagreement cases and comparing them with the voting results in all the cases, this article excludes the influence of technical factors on the analysis of the political tendencies in the voting behavior of ITC members so as to evaluate objectively whether ITC exists or not Discrimination in China. The paper finds that at the level of the overall ruling, ITC’s affirmative decisions on China in far different cases are much lower than the proportion of affirmative decisions in all cases, and closer to ITC’s overall affirmative in all disagreements Ruling ratio. From the point of view of members’ personal voting behavior, the vast majority of members have not changed their trade policy positions because of the cases involving China. They are also basically the same in comparison with the strength of members with “goodwill” and “hostility” in China Balanced. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence that ITC has discriminated against China.