论文部分内容阅读
2009年“两高”颁布的司法解释对恶意透支型信用卡诈骗的部分要件的理解和认定进行了细化,但是对于恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪的主体要件未涉及,在司法实践中出现了登记持卡人与实际使用人不一致的情形,在这种情况下如何认定犯罪主体“持卡人”成为一个问题。本文对前述问题在现今理论界的争议意见进行分析,综合考虑提出相关建议,希望本文对该问题的解决能有所裨益。
Judicial interpretation promulgated in 2009 by the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme Court of the People’s Republic of China clarified the understanding and recognition of some elements of malicious overdraft credit card fraud. However, the main elements of the crime of malicious overdraft credit card fraud were not involved and appeared in judicial practice Registration of cardholders and the actual user inconsistent situation, in this case how to identify the criminal subject “cardholder ” become a problem. This article analyzes the controversial opinions on the aforementioned problems in today’s theoritical circles and considers the relevant suggestions synthetically. I hope this article can be helpful to the solution of this issue.