本文以戴维斯在《解构与翻译》中对德里达“延异”思想的误读为出发点,在对其进行批判的基础上论证指出,“延异”突出的是“前起源”的动态,而不是“起源”的状态。进而推出,在延异观照下的德里达的翻译思想是一种超越了形而上学二项对立后的“前起源”的翻译,而不是“起源”之中的翻译。 Based on Davis’s misunderstanding of Derrida’s “Differences in Differences” in Deconstruction and Translation, this dissertation argues on the basis of his criticism that “disparity” highlights “ Before the origin of ”dynamic, rather than “ origin ”state. Furthermore, Derrida’s translation thought is a translation beyond the contradictory metaphysics of “pre-origin” instead of “origin”.