论文部分内容阅读
广大教师在讲读文言文时,会遇到不同的版本对文字、断句、解释等的不同阐释,那么我们该以哪一个为标准呢?《择善而从》就给我们解决了这道难题。《言为心声》和《辞达而已矣》两篇文章探讨的是有关作文内容和作文表达的问题。《言为心声》主要探讨了评价作文内容好坏的四大尺度,即是否真实、通达、恳挚、高尚,而《辞达而已矣》重点论述了作文表达中“信”与“达”两个方面的问题。笔法幽默,文字自然流畅。使人于愉快中有所收获。(温加彬)
When teachers are reading classical Chinese, they will encounter different versions of different interpretations of words, sentences, interpretations, etc. Then, which one should we use as the criterion? “Choose the Good and Follow” gives us a solution to this problem. The articles “Let Words Are in Mind” and “The Words Are Found” discuss the content of the composition and the expression of the composition. The “words and hearts” mainly discusses the four major criteria for assessing the composition of the composition, namely, whether it is authentic, accessible, profane, and noble. However, “Resignation and Deafness” focuses on the expression of “letters” and “reach” in composition expressions. "Two aspects of the problem. Brushwork is humorous and the text is naturally smooth. Make people happy in the joy. (Wen Jiabin)