论文部分内容阅读
决定论与非决定论的争论由来已久,但至今尚无定论。这两种对立的理论都可以为自己找到充分的论据,因而都具有不可反驳性。两者争论的基点在于对规律性的认识,而争论的本质在于对各自内涵的界定。若从“决定性”意义上界定两者的内涵,则争论的对立性会弱化,而两者的互补性会更准确地描述自然界及人类社会现象。
The debate between determinism and non-determinism has been around for a long time, but so far there is no conclusion. Both of these opposing theories can find sufficient arguments for themselves and thus have irrefutability. The basis of the argument between the two lies in the understanding of regularity, and the essence of the debate lies in the definition of their respective connotations. If we define the connotation of the two in the “decisive” sense, the opposition of the debate will be weakened, and the complementarity of the two will more accurately describe the phenomena of nature and human society.