近年来,经济学家开始日益关注各种形式的学习——诸如获取与工作有关的先进技术,或学习如何更有效率地玩经济生活的“博弈”——对于经济后果的影响,然而,大多数关于相关主题的经验研究,都是以人为设计的、远离了大部分老百姓经济生活实况的实验为基础。本文通过将晚近的一些关于学习与经济的宏观经济学讨论联系到针对一个台湾家庭的民族志,从人类学的观点对这些讨论进行了一番省思,虽然像这类随机获取的民族志证据不可能真正推翻宏观经济学的论点,但它确实对后者提出了意味深长的问题,并且提示了进一步研究的途径。 In recent years, economists have started to pay increasing attention to the impact of various forms of learning, such as access to work-related advanced technologies, or learning how to play economy more efficiently, on the economic consequences, however Most empirical studies on related topics are based on experiments designed by people far from the realities of most people’s economic life. This article examines these discussions from the anthropological point of view by linking some recent macroeconomic discussions of learning and economics to ethnocentric accounts of a Taiwanese family, though such random evidence of ethnographic evidence It is impossible to really overturn the macroeconomic arguments, but it does raise the very big questions for the latter and suggests ways of further research.