论文部分内容阅读
背景:随着各种违法犯罪现象的持续增多,研究导致违法犯罪发生原因成为目前比较重要的课题,而在这些原因中犯罪者的个性和社会心理因素是不可忽视的。目的:探讨男性服刑人员的个性特征及心理健康状况,以便及时矫正服刑人员的不良个性及心理。设计:以服刑人员为研究对象,以正常人为对照,观察对比,调查研究。单位:一所医学院医院的心理科。对象:选择2001-12/2002-03在贵州省第一监狱男性服刑人员575名为研究组;以同期贵阳市云关乡附近的农民及工人265名为对照组,均为男性,年龄、文化程度与实验组匹配。方法:采用艾森克个性问卷和精神症状自评量表对研究组和对照组研究对象进行测试并将两组结果予以比较。主要观察指标:两组艾森克个性问卷,症状自评量表评分结果比较。结果:研究组艾森克个性问卷显示内外向、神经质、精神病质维度评分(9.97±2.32,12.00±2.62,11.04±2.44)明显高于对照组(9.28±2.77,10.25±2.68,8.03±2.51)(P<0.01),掩饰性维度评分略高于对照组,但差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。研究组艾森克个性问卷量表各维度各型人数均明显高于或低于对照组(t=2.05～3.06,P<0.01)。研究组症状自评量表中总分、总均分、阳性项目数以及9个因子分明显高于对照组(t=3.23～7.89,P<0.01)。结论:与一般成年人相比?
Background: With the continuous increase of all kinds of illegal and criminal phenomena, it is now an important issue to study the causes of criminal offenses. For these reasons, the individuality and psychosocial factors of criminals can not be ignored. Objective: To investigate the personality characteristics and mental health status of male prisoners in order to promptly correct the unfavorable personality and psychology of prisoners. Design: The prisoners as the research object, normal people as a control, observe the contrast, investigation and research. Unit: a medical school hospital psychology. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 575 male inmates in the first prison of Guizhou Province were chosen as research groups from December 2001 to March 2002; 265 peasants and workers near Yun-Gui Township in Guiyang City were selected as control group, all of whom were male, age and culture The degree of match with the experimental group. Methods: Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Psychiatric Symptom Checklist were used to test the study group and the control group, and the results of the two groups were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two groups of Eysenck personality questionnaire, symptom self-rating scale score results were compared. Results: The Eysenck personality questionnaire in the study group showed that the scores of extroversion, neuroticism and psychosis were significantly higher than those of the control group (9.28 ± 2.77, 10.25 ± 2.68 and 8.03 ± 2.51) (9.97 ± 2.32, 12.00 ± 2.62, 11.04 ± 2.44) (P <0.01). The masking dimension score was slightly higher than that of the control group, but the difference was not significant (P> 0.05). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Scale in the study group was significantly higher or lower than that in the control group (t = 2.05-3.06, P <0.01). The total score, total score, number of positive items and 9 factors in the self-rating symptom questionnaire group were significantly higher than those in the control group (t = 3.23-7.89, P <0.01). Conclusion: Compared with the average adult?