论文部分内容阅读
当代文学研究对史料的依赖度,取决于研究的对象和所运用的方法。史料不可能还原绝对意义上的历史现场,但利用可靠的史料能澄清当代文学研究中的一些问题。所谓可靠的史料,是相对于不那么可靠的而言。洪子诚的《材料和注释:1957年中国作协党组扩大会议》一文,是史料运用的一次成功实践,也彰显了史料研究所能达到的限度,但这同时表明史料的应用,可以从追问历史的原初状态转向追问历史现象所构成的意义。
The dependence of contemporary literary studies on historical materials depends on the object of study and the methods used. Historical material can not be restored in the absolute sense of the historical scene, but the use of reliable historical materials to clarify some of the issues in contemporary literature. The so-called reliable historical data, is relative to the less reliable. Hong Zi-cheng’s “Materials and Notes: An Enlarged Conference of Chinese Writers’ Associations and Groups in 1957” is a successful application of historical materials and highlights the limits that historical research can achieve. At the same time, it shows that historical materials can be applied from the original State transition to question the meaning of historical phenomena.