论文部分内容阅读
案例:今年3月9日,甲县技术监督局行政执法人员对××门市部经销的标识总含量为45%的复合肥按标准抽取了样品,抽样基数为20吨(未售)。该县行政执法人员将样品送往乙县法定质量监督部门检验,检验结果:含氮14、磷15、钾14,总含量为42%(实际数量应为43),检验部门出具的检验报告为日常监督检验。而后甲县技术监督局对经销门市部进行了处罚。处罚依据《产品质量法》第50条做了以
Case: On March 9 this year, the administrative law enforcement officers of the County Bureau of Technical Supervision sampled samples of fertilizer with the total mark of 45% distributed by ×× Sales Department according to the standard. The sampling base was 20 tons (unsold). The county administrative law enforcement officers will be sent to the sample B, the statutory quality supervision department inspection, test results: nitrogen 14, phosphorus 15, potassium 14, the total content of 42% (the actual number should be 43), the inspection department issued a test report Daily supervision and inspection. After the county Bureau of Technical Supervision on the distribution and marketing department was punished. Punishment based on “Product Quality Law” Article 50 made