论文部分内容阅读
以往国内外理论界对唯物史观主体实践仅从物质生活资料生产单一基础理解,深入犁耕经典著作文本发现,马克思和恩格斯努力揭示个人生存实践的丰富性,以探寻实现理想社会目标的现实基础和可行路径。他们至少确认了人的三大基本生存实践:以物质生活资料生产为核心的劳动谋生实践,以人自身的生产活动为核心的生理延生实践,以自主自由活动为核心的休闲乐生实践,这成为考察每个人自由全面发展程度的三大现实生活基础。马克思和恩格斯一生主要致力于劳动谋生实践方面的批判研究,对生理延生实践只做了少量研究,留下了片段思想;休闲乐生实践虽然也内在其思想逻辑中,但在他们有生之年还未及展开研究。这种思想发展的内在不平衡性,成为我们从文本出发与时俱进发展马克思主义的重要内在逻辑生长点。
In the past, both domestic and overseas theorists did a single understanding of the main practice of materialist conception of history from the material life material production alone and deeply plowed the texts of the classic writings. Marx and Engels endeavored to reveal the richness of individual existence in order to explore the realistic basis for realizing the ideal social goal And feasible path. They at least confirmed the three basic living practices of people: labor making and living with material living materials at the core, physiological extending practices with people’s own production as the core, leisure and life practice with independent and free activities as the core Become the basis for examining the three major realities of life for all people in an all-round way. Marx and Engels mainly devoted themselves to the critical research in the practice of labor making and living, and only made a small amount of research on the practice of physiological extension, leaving the idea of fragments; although the practice of leisure and life is inherently still in its logic of logic, Start researching The inherent imbalance in the development of this ideology has become an important internal logical growth point for us to proceed with the times and advance Marxism from the text.