论文部分内容阅读
案情简介 ×报在1995午11月刊登一篇文章,说有一家“太阳报系”的报纸销量大跌需要“救亡”,为求促销,“无所不用其极抢新闻”,“重走当年大波裸星路线”。D报报业集团公司认为文章是影射自己,发出律师信要求×报澄清和道歉,×报不肯,遂诉至法庭。高等法院于1997午11月7日裁定涉讼文章影射D报,构成诽滂。×报赔偿D报报业集团10万元,并付堂费。
Brief introduction X newspaper published an article in November 1995, saying that the newspaper sales of a newspaper “Sun Newspaper” need to “save the country.” In order to promote the market, Big wave bare star route. " D newspaper group think the article is the shadow of their own, issued a lawyer letter × reported to clarify and apologize, × reluctantly, then sued to court. On 7 November 1997, the High Court ruled that the litigation article reflected the D newspaper and constituted a slander. × Reported D reported newspaper group 100,000 yuan, and pay the hall fee.