论文部分内容阅读
作为经典研究范式的民族志与民俗志,近些年来在民族学、人类学、民俗学等多学科的对话中越来越受到学者们的关注,特别是在中国民间文化研究已成为“显学”的当代,随着田野调查的普遍展开,民族志、民俗志的书写也成为绕不开的一个核心话题。2006年12月16日至17日,由北京师范大学文学院民俗学与文化人类学研究所、北京师范大学民俗文化普查与研究中心、北京民间文艺家协会联合主办了“民族志·民俗志的理论与实践学术研讨会”,三十多位民俗学界、人类学界的知名学者围绕“民族志·民俗志的理论与实践”这一议题展开了充分而热烈的讨论。由于篇幅所限,本期摘引的发言主要涉及“民族志”与“民俗志”的概念辨析和学理渊源、“民族志”与“民俗志”各自的学科定位、民族志的书写和表述、民俗志的地方性、多村落的民俗学调查、“在地化”研究的得失等几个方面的问题,以飨读者。
As a classic research paradigm, ethnography and ethnography have drawn more and more attention from scholars in the multidisciplinary dialogues of ethnology, anthropology and folklore, especially in China since the study of folk culture has become “significant” Contemporary, with the widespread field investigation, ethnography, folklore writing has become a core topic can not be detached. From December 16 to December 17, 2006, the Institute of Folklore and Cultural Anthropology, Beijing Normal University, Institute of Folk Culture Census and Research, Beijing Normal University and Beijing Folk Literature and Art Association co-sponsored “Ethnography and Ethnography Theory and Practice Symposium, ”more than 30 well-known scholars in the field of folklore and anthropology conducted a full and enthusiastic discussion on the topic of“ Theories and Practices of Ethnography and Ethnography. ” Due to limited space, the key quotations from the current issue mainly focus on the conceptual differentiation and academic origins of “ethnography” and “ethnography”, their respective disciplinary orientations of “ethnography” and “ethnography”, the writing and presentation of ethnography, folklore Localism, multi-village folklore investigation, “localization” gains and losses and other aspects of the problem, to readers.