论文部分内容阅读
最近,翻阅报纸的经济新闻,感到有的记者和通讯员,在运用数字方面,态度不够严谨。有的对比不当,有的夸大过分。例一,四月上旬各报报道:“今年上海出现了‘工业生产是加法,能源消耗是减法’的十分可喜的现象,全市在能源供应总量比去年减少的情况下,第一季度总产值比去年同期增长了百分之八点六。”这个说法不确切。因为,全市“能源供应总量比去年减少”,不等于第一季度实用能源减少,这是两个概念。据统计,一季度实用能源比去年同期是增长了百分之零点八三。因此,只能说同生产增长百分之八点六相比,消耗比例是下降了,但不是绝对量的减少,所以不能说是减法。例二,文汇报四月七日关于上海轻重工业比重的报道,说:“全市工业总产值中轻、重工业的比例,今年第一季度为百分之五十一比百
Recently, reading the newspaper’s economic news, I feel that some reporters and correspondents are not rigorous in using the figures. Some misconduct, and some exaggerated. For example, in the first days of April, newspapers reported: “This year, there was a very gratifying phenomenon in Shanghai that industrial production was an addition and energy consumption was a deduction. As the city’s total energy supply decreased over last year, the output value of the first quarter An increase of 8.6% over the same period of last year. ”This statement is not clear. Because, the city “total energy supply decreased over last year,” does not mean that the first quarter of practical energy reduction, which is the concept of two. According to statistics, in the first quarter, usable energy was up by 0.83% over the same period of last year. Therefore, we can only say that the proportion of consumption has decreased but not the decrease of absolute amount compared to the increase of 8.6% in production, so we can not say that it is a subtraction. Example 2 Wen Wei Po April 7 report on the proportion of Shanghai’s light and heavy industries, said: "The city’s industrial output value of light and heavy industry, the proportion of the first quarter of this year was 51%