论文部分内容阅读
2012年的四川彭州“天价乌木案”中,国家所有权与私人所有权的直接博弈,不仅引来了各界的关注,更是引发了物权法学界就天价乌木归属权的热烈讨论。本文以此案为中心,从物权法的维度对天价乌木的归属进行了集中的分析与讨论,首先对当事人的主张进行了分析与评价,包括发现埋藏物制度和天然孳息;其次,针对镇政府提出的自然资源的国家所有权进行反驳,并反思国家所有权客体之界限,提出我们需要明确国家所有权客体法定原则;最后,对国家所有权行使主体超越权利界限的行为进行了反思,提出代表国家行使所有权的政府应当在国家所有权缺位情形下退出所有权纷争,以先占规则来解决天价乌木案。
In 2012 Pengzhou, Sichuan Province, “the case of ebony price”, the direct game of state ownership and private ownership not only attracted the attention of all walks of life, but also triggered a heated discussion in the jurisprudence of real rights on the ownership of ebony. This article takes the case as the center, analyzes and discusses the ownership of Ebony from the dimension of the Real Right Law. Firstly, it analyzes and evaluates the parties’ claims, including the discovery of buried objects and natural fruits. Secondly, Proposed the natural resources of the state ownership to refute, and reflect on the boundaries of state ownership of objects, we need to clarify the object of the statutory principle of state ownership; Finally, the subject of the state ownership of the right to transcend the limits of the conduct of conduct of conduct, put forward to represent the state to exercise ownership The government should withdraw from ownership disputes in the absence of state ownership and settle the case of eugeny with price-first rule.