论文部分内容阅读
‘歷史教學’九月號載周南同志論‘天朝田畝制度’中農業社會主義思想一文。周南同志在論證這種思想‘在實質上’的‘反動性’時,列舉了三個理由:一、絕對平均主義是手工業者和小農經濟的產物;二、在小農經濟基礎上來實現‘社會主義’乃是不能實现的空想;三、以農業社會主義思想為指導的‘天朝田畝制度’中分田法的規定,不是為着使社會生產力向前發展,而是使社會生產力停滯在分散的小農經營的落後經濟形式的水平上,農民不論工作和需要都只有一定的土地財產以維持将够的生活,勢必打擊其向上積極性而難以提高社會生產力,推動社會發展。
“History Teaching” in September contains Comrade Zhou Nan 'Tian Tian Mu system' in a text thought of agricultural socialism. Comrade Zhou Nan demonstrated three reasons for this 'essentially' reactionary reaction: 1. Absolute egalitarianism is a product of the handicraft industry and the peasant economy. Second, socialism is to be achieved on the basis of the peasant economy 'Is an unimaginable dream that can not be realized. Third, the provisions of the Tian-Tian Fa in the system of' Heavenly fields and fields under the guidance of the socialist socialism 'are not aimed at moving social productive forces forward but rather stagnating the social productive forces in scattered small farmers At the level of backward economic forms operated by them, peasants, irrespective of their work and needs, only have certain land and property to maintain a viable life. It is bound to combat their upward enthusiasm and their difficulty in raising social productivity and promote social development.