欧盟职业教育培训政策的起点存在分歧。历史演进有“三阶段说”和“四阶段说”之分。阶段划分标准和结果的不同,反映了作者研究意图的差异。从历史研究的角度看,分段作为一种方法没有优劣之分。从政策研究的角度看,Ertl的阶段划分更好地反映了政策的本质,对政策的历史演进更具解释力和说服力。 There are differences in the starting point of the EU’s vocational education and training policy. Historical evolution has “three stages said ” and “four stages said ” of the points. The difference between the standard and the result of stage division reflects the difference of the author’s research intention. From a historical perspective, segmentation as a method has no advantages or disadvantages. From a policy research point of view, Ertl’s phased division better reflects the nature of the policy and makes it more explanatory and persuasive about the historical evolution of policy.