我们打算从“开卷有益”的争论谈起。 “开卷有益”这个格言式熟语,前些时候颇引起过一番争论。同意者把它当作格言,认为它揭示了一个真理:只要肯看书学习,多少总能得些益处。否定者则认为:“开卷”未必“有益”;比如看坏书,不仅无益,反而有害。我以为,否定者是在钻牛角尖,是抬杠。如果效法钻牛角尖式抬杠,我们可以提出一连串的问题,钻进牛角尖里出不来,继续抬杠抬下去。比如:“开卷有益”是针对读坏书提出来的么?是提倡大家去读坏书么?读坏书就绝对 We intend to start with the argument that “uncoiling is useful.” The motto of “open book” is quite controversial. The consenter uses it as the motto, believing it reveals the truth that as long as it is willing to read a book, how much can it always benefit. Negators think: “unwinding” may not be “useful”; such as watching bad books, not only useless, but harmful. I think that the negator is at the tip of the line, is the bickering. If we follow the example of drilling horns, we can raise a series of questions and get rid of them. For example: “the benefits of open book” for reading bad books put forward it? Is to promote everyone to read bad books?