一位来自基层的教师——徐慧林——在《教师博览》网上论坛发了一个帖子:“民主尊重式教育,你在基层还好吗?”文章历数农村中小学教师遭遇的尴尬现实:对学生越是尊重、宽容、民主,学生越发肆无忌惮、变本加厉,甚至觉得老师人善可欺;对学生严厉冷峻,甚至动用暴力拳脚相加.学生倒个个噤若寒蝉、乖巧听话。而且后者教学成绩明显优于前者。一石激起千重浪,帖子发出后,回帖者甚众,讨论极为热烈。此外,本刊今年第3期“编读桥”栏目曾刊登用丽平读者来信,题为《困惑》,讲述的事情与徐慧林文中所述情况类似:一个学生有“拿”别人东西的习惯。老师一直希望用爱心和宽容去包容和感化他,谁知不仅未取得预期效果,该生竞偷到了这位老师的头上。这封信刊出后。同样在读者中引起强烈反响。以上情况的出现绝非偶然。它说明民主宽容教育在基层中小学遭遇尴尬。基层教师的困惑具有一定的普遍性。一边是良好的愿望、良苦的用心,一边是依然故我甚至愈演愈烈。那么,民主宽容教育在基层真的行不通吗?它到底还能走多远? 为此,我们特地发动了更大范围的讨论(江苏吴江高级中学还以此为主题组织了一次“教科沙龙”),并围绕这一主题组织了一组文章。希望能对大家的教育思考和实践有所裨益。 A teacher from the grassroots - Xu Huilin - made a post on the “Teacher Expo” online forum: “Democratic respect education, are you okay at the grassroots level?” The article looks at the embarrassing facts faced by rural primary and secondary school teachers: Yes. The more respected, tolerant and democratic the students are, the more unscrupulous the students are, the more intensified they are, and even feel that the teachers are good at bullying; the students are severe and cold, and even use violence to fight together. The students are downcast, obedient and obedient. And the latter’s teaching performance is significantly better than the former. One stone provoked thousands of waves. After the post was sent out, the replies were very popular and the discussion was extremely enthusiastic. In addition, this year’s third issue of the “Reading Bridge” column has published a letter from the reader of Liping, titled “Confused”. The story described is similar to what Xu Hui Lin Wenzhong described: A student has a habit of “taking” someone else’s stuff. . The teacher has always wanted to embrace and influence him with love and forbearance. Who knows not only did not achieve the desired results, the student ran to the teacher’s head. After this letter is published. It also caused a strong reaction among readers. The emergence of the above situation is by no means accidental. It shows that democratic tolerance education suffers at primary and secondary schools. The confusion of grass-roots teachers has a certain degree of universality. On the one hand, it is good intentions and good intentions. On the other side, I still get even worse. Then, is democracy tolerance education really impracticable at the grassroots level? How far can it go? To that end, we specifically launched a wider range of discussions (Jiangsu Wujiang Senior High School organized a “scientific salon” as the theme). ) and organized a group of articles around this topic. I hope to benefit everyone’s educational thinking and practice.